Process:
Our group’s process was rather different than the other groups’ because we were using clay from the Carleton Arboretum, gathered by geology and pottery students at Carleton, rather than the mass-produced combination clay used in most modern pottery studios. We began by first grinding arb clay that had been dried for months, and perhaps over a year, under rough stone bricks. When the clay was ground into a fine particulate, we removed larger stones and pieces of gravel before rehydrating the clay with freshwater. We rehydrated to the touch, so there were plenty of moments where we overestimated the amount of water we needed, and had to add more ground clay so the final product would not be too wet. When the clay body felt right, we formed it into a series of pots during the lab period that we processed the next day.
Challenges:
The first challenge that our group faced was rehydrating the dried clay. The ground clay powder has to have water added and worked into it before it can be formed into a workable clay body for forming a pot. However, all of us fell prey to overwatering the mixture even though we were adding moisture piecemeal, and had to grind up additional clay to balance out the composition of the clay body.
The next difficulty came with forming. None of us had ever done ceramics before to a serious extent, so we had little inkling of how to actually shape a pot. None of us were able to get the desired form on the first go, and instead had to restart at least once to have a better balance between the pinch pot base and the coiled section of the pot.
Data:
Original | After 1 Day | Loss | Before Firing | Loss | After Firing | Loss | |
Weight | 530g | 564g | -34g | 523g | 41g | 506g | 17g |
Height | 73mm | 72mm | 1mm | 71mm | 1mm | 72mm | -1mm |
Diameter (rim) | 57mm | 57mm | 0mm | 57mm | 0mm | 56mm | 1mm |
Diameter (widest) | 103mm | 101mm | 2mm | 101mm | 0mm | 100mm | 1mm |
Wall Section | 6mm | 7mm | -1mm | 7mm | 0mm | 5mm | 2mm |
Original | After 1 Day | Loss | Before Firing | Loss | After Firing | Loss | |
Weight | 543g | 512g | 32g | 475g | 37g | 460 | 83 |
Height | 7cm | 6cm | 1cm | 6cm | 0cm | 6cm | 0cm |
Diameter (rim) | 5cm | 5cm | 0cm | 4.5cm | 0.5cm | 5cm | -0.5cm |
Diameter (widest) | 11cm | 11cm | 0cm | 10cm | 1cm | 10cm | 0cm |
Wall Section | 9.85mm | 8.01mm | 1.84mm | 4.28mm | 3.73mm | 10.15mm | -5.87mm |
Original | After 1 Day | Loss | Before Firing | Loss | After Firing | Loss | |
Weight | 517g | 472g | 45g | 417g | |||
Height | 94mm | 85mm | 9mm | 90.38mm | |||
Diameter (rim) | 47.5mm | 42mm | 5.5mm | 65.79mm | |||
Diameter (widest) | 84mm | 80mm | 4mm | 87.90mm | |||
Wall Section | 11.8mm | 11.8mm | 0mm | 11.2mm |
Post-Firing Reflection
After firing, all of our pots made it! Compared to other groups, it seems like the natural tempering in the arb clay makes a substantial improvement on survivability during the firing process. The color also closely resembles that of Anglo-Saxon pottery, which makes sense considering the similarities between Arb and English wild clays.
0 thoughts on “Group E Lab Data: Week 3 (Pottery)”